The Patriarchal and Synodical Encyclical – Precursor of both Ecumenism and the Calendar Change
We know that the years 1919-1920 had a great significance for the heretical movement of Ecumenism. During these two years, John C. Rockefeller Jr. began to drastically sponsor the Ecumenical Movement. In Constantinople at the Ecumenical Patriarchate plans were being inspired and brewing.
In 1920, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople issued a document with the official title of “Synodical Encyclical of the Church of Constantinople to the Churches of Christ In All Places”. The title itself is misleading and heretical in that it is evident when one reads the encyclical that the previously mentioned “Churches” are not the local Orthodox Churches, but the “churches” of the heretics. This encyclical was printed at the printing house of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and published in four languages; Greek, English, French, and Russian.
On the 10 of January of 1919, the locum tenens of the then widowed throne of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Metropolitan Dorotheos of Prousa, stated that “I think it is well time that the Orthodox Church should seriously think about the matter of union (not the return of heretics to the fold but of union!) of the separated Christian Churches, especially of the Anglican, Old Catholic, and Armenian Churches. This important announcement of and command for the study of the matter of approaching and more so of the union of the different Christian confessions towards the assembling of a “communion of Churches” must come from the Great Church of Constantinople in the East.”
Metropolitan Dorotheos of Prousa, served as the locum tenens of the throne of Constantinople from October of 1918 to March 6, 1921. He died in London, literally in the hands of the Archbishop of Canterbury Randall Thomas Davidson at the very moment he was placing a pectoral Panagia on the heretical archbishop’s neck thus recognizing his priesthood.
The Encyclical reads as follows:
PATRIARCHAL AND SYNODICAL ENCYCLICAL OF 1920
“Unto the Churches of Christ everywhere”“Love one another earnestly from the heart.”
(I Peter 1. 22)Our own church holds that rapprochement between the various Christian Churches and fellowship between them is not excluded by the doctrinal differences which exist between them. In our opinion such a rapprochement is highly desirable and necessary. It would be useful in many ways for the real interest of each particular church and of the whole Christian body, and also for the preparation and advancement of that blessed union which will be completed in the future in accordance with the will of God. We therefore consider that the present time is most favorable for bringing this important question and studying it together.
Even if in this case, owing to antiquated prejudices, practices or pretensions, the difficulties which have so often jeopardized attempts at reunion in the past may arise or be brought up, nevertheless, in our view, since we are concerned at this initial stage only with contacts and rapprochement, these difficulties are of less importance. If there is good will and intention, they cannot and should not create an invincible and insuperable obstacle. Wherefore, considering such an endeavor to be both possible and timely especially in view of the hopeful establishment of the League of Nations we venture to express below in brief our thoughts and our opinion regarding the way in which we understand this rapprochement and contact and how we consider it to be realizable; we earnestly ask and invite the judgment and the opinion of the other sister churches in the East and of the venerable Christian churches in the West and everywhere in the world. We believe that the two following measures would greatly contribute to the rapprochement ‘ which is so much to be desired and which would be so useful, and we believe that they would be both successful and fruitful: First, we consider as necessary and indispensable the removal and abolition of all the mutual mistrust and bitterness between the different churches which arise from the tendency of some of them to entice and proselytize adherents of other confessions. For nobody ignores what is unfortunately happening today in many places, disturbing the internal peace of the churches, especially in the Exist. So many troubles and sufferings are caused by other Christians and great hatred and enemity are aroused, with such insignificant results, by this tendency of some to proselytize and entice the followers of other Christian confessions.After this essential reestablishment of sincerity and confidence between the churches, we consider,Secondly, that above all love should be rekindled and strengthened among the churches, so that they should no more consider one another as strangers and foreigners, but as relatives, and as being a part of the household of Christ and “fellow heirs, members of the same body and partakers of the promise of God in Christ” (Eph. 3. 6). For if the different churches are inspired by love and place it before everything else in their judgments of others and their relationships with them, instead of increasing and widening the existing dissensions, they should be enabled to reduce and diminish them. By stirring up a right brotherly interest in the condition, the well-being and stability of the other churches; by readiness to take an interest in what is happening in those churches and to obtain a better knowledge of them,and by willingness to offer mutual aid and help, many good things will be achieved for the glory and the benefit both of themselves and of the Christian body. In our opinion, such a friendship and kindly disposition towards each other can be shown and demonstrated particularly in the following ways: By the acceptance of a uniform calendar for the celebration of the great Christian feasts at the same time by all the churches. By the exchange of brotherly letters on the occasion of the great feasts of the churches’ year as is customary, and on other exceptional occasions. By close relationships between the representatives of all churches wherever they may be. By relationships between the theological schools and the professors of theology; by theexchange of theological and ecclesiastical reviews, and of other works published in each church. By exchanging students for further training between the seminaries of the different churches. By convoking pan-Christian conferences in order to examine questions of common interest to all the churches. By impartial and deeper historical study of doctrinal differences both by the seminaries and in books. By mutual respect for the customs and practices in different churches. By allowing each other the use of chapels and cemeteries for the funerals and burials of believers of other confessions dying in foreign lands. By the settlement of the question of mixed marriages between the confessions. Lastly, by wholehearted mutual assistance for the churches in their endeavors for religious advancement, charity and so on. Such a sincere and close contact between the churches will be all the more useful and profitable for the whole body of the Church, because manifold dangers threaten not only particular churches, but all of them. These dangers attack the very foundations of the Christian faith and the essence of Christian life and society. For the terrible world war which has just finished brought to light many unhealthy symptoms in the life of the Christian peoples, and often revealed great lack of respect even for the elementary principles of justice and charity. Thus it worsened already existing wounds and opened other new ones of a more material kind, which demand the attention and care of all the churches. Alcoholism, which is increasing daily; the increase of unnecessary luxury under the pretext of bettering life and enjoying it; the voluptuousness and lust hardly covered by the cloak of freedom and emancipation of the flesh; the prevailing unchecked licentiousness and indecency in literature, painting, the theater, and in music, under the respectable name of the development of good taste and cultivation of fine art; the deification of wealth and the contempt of higher ideals; all these and the like, as they threaten the very essence of Christian societies are also timely topics requiring and indeed necessitating common study and cooperation by the Christian churches. Finally, it is the duty of the churches which bear the sacred name of Christ not to forget or neglect any longer his new and great commandment of love. Nor should they continue to fall piteously behind the political authorities, who, truly applying the spirit of the Gospel and of the teaching of Christ, have under happy auspices already setup the so-called League of Nations in order to defend justice and cultivate charity and agreement between the nations. For all these reasons, being ourselves convinced of the necessity for establishing a contact and league (fellowship) 1 between the churches and believing that the other churches share our conviction as stated above, at least as a beginning we request each one of them to send us in reply a statement of its own judgment and opinion on this matter so that common agreement or resolution having been read, we may proceed together to its realization, and thus “speaking the truth in love; may grow up into Him in all things, which is the head, even Christ; from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.” (Eph.4: 15,16).In the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the
month of January in the year of grace 1920.
Examining this encyclical a little, we find that at the very beginning we are sure that this encyclical is not addressed to the local Orthodox Churches but rather to heretic bodies because it states that “Our own church holds that rapprochement between the various Christian Churches and fellowship between them is not excluded by the doctrinal differences which exist between them.”
How can rapprochement be possible when there are “doctrinal differences”?
The encyclical states that “First, we consider as necessary and indispensable the removal and abolition of all the mutual mistrust and bitterness between the different churches which arise from the tendency of some of them to entice and proselytize adherents of other confessions”. This would, of course, mean that the One, Holy, Catholic, and Orthodox Church should not convert “adherents of other confessions”. The Truth of Christ should not, according to this statement, be shared with those who are in the darkness of heresy.
The statement “owing to antiquated prejudices, practices or pretensions, the difficulties which have so often jeopardized attempts at reunion in the past” certainly seems to indicate that the Holy Orthodox Church also had antiquated prejudices (by not accepting heresy) and pretensions (in keeping the Faith).
The encyclical continues by saying that, “Secondly, that above all, love should be rekindled and strengthened among the churches, so that they should no more consider one another as strangers and foreigners, but as relatives, and as being a part of the household of Christ and “fellow heirs, members of the same body and partakers of the promise of God in Christ”
Here we are told that members of heretical bodies are “fellow heirs, members of the same body and partakers of the promise of God in Christ”. This teaches that the heretical bodies are members of the same body- the same Church- the same mystical Body of Christ. This is the very teaching of the heretical ecumenists who consider the members all the different dogmas to be members of the One Church!
The encyclical goes on to say, “In our opinion, such a friendship and kindly disposition towards each other can be shown and demonstrated particularly in the following ways:
a. By the acceptance of a uniform calendar for the celebration of the great Christian feasts at the same time by all the churches.“